Why the study?
Does oriented ventilation improve the reliability of pulmonary capillary blood flow measurement by partial CO2 rebreathing compared to spontaneous ventilation in subjects without cardiopulmonary disease?
Does oriented ventilation improve the reliability of pulmonary capillary blood flow measurement by partial CO2 rebreathing compared to spontaneous ventilation in subjects without cardiopulmonary disease?
The partial CO2 rebreathing technique for measuring pulmonary capillary blood flow is adversely affected by spontaneous ventilation and is more reliable with regular respiratory patterns.
Oriented ventilation may improve reliability of partial CO2 rebreathing measurements; leaves open applicability in cardiopulmonary disease.
The partial CO2 rebreathing technique has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive method for measurement of pulmonary capillary blood flow (Qc), but experience with this technique has been limited to controlled mechanical ventilation. In this study, we evaluated this technique during spontaneous and oriented ventilation in nine subjects without known cardiopulmonary disease. Subjects underwent 10 consecutive (Qc) measurements with both spontaneous and oriented ventilation. Breath-by-breath gas exchange was measured and (Qc) was calculated from changes in CO2 elimination and PETCO2, which were achieved by sudden increase of the apparatus deadspace (rebreathing period). An exponential curve was fitted to the PETCO2 values in the rebreathing period in order to estimate PETCO2 at equilibrium. We found that mean (Qc) values were not influenced by the ventilation pattern (P=0.51), but that the intra-individual variability with oriented ventilation (median=16.0%) was significantly lower than with spontaneous ventilation (median=31.8%, P=0.039). Accordingly, the curve fitting for rebreathing PETCO2 rise failed in 4.4% of measurements with oriented ventilation vs. 18.9% of measurements with spontaneous ventilation (P=0.039). Our results suggest that the performance of the partial CO2 rebreathing technique is adversely affected by spontaneous ventilation and, consequently, that this method should be reserved for patients with regular respiratory patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abreu et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: