Key result
Elevated NT-proBNP links to ~63% higher stage B heart failure odds despite poor discrimination.
Why the study?
While NT-proBNP is a key biomarker for earlier stage heart failure (stage B heart failure), its screening performance among cancer survivors remains uncertain.
Does NT-proBNP accurately screen for stage B heart failure in long-term cancer survivors?
Cross-Sectional (n=441)
Does NT-proBNP accurately screen for stage B heart failure in long-term cancer survivors?
NT-proBNP has poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting stage B heart failure in long-term cancer survivors, limiting its utility as a standalone screening tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Our previous studies have shown cancer survivors face nearly double the risk of cardiovascular disease. This study adds to that picture by showing survivors also carry a greater volume of high-risk plaque. It tells us we need to be more proactive with heart risk assessment and management in this group.”
Limits NT-proBNP utility for screening stage B heart failure in survivors; leaves open need for prospective validation of combined strategies.
Background and Aims Heart failure is a progressive disorder that can be identified at earlier stage, also known as stage B heart failure (SBHF). While N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was shown to be a key biomarker, its screening performance among cancer survivors remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the performance of NT-proBNP in identifying SBHF, encompassing both structural and functional abnormalities, in survivors. Methods Survivors ≥5 years post cancer therapy and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor were recruited. SBHF was defined as diastolic dysfunction (E/e’ >13 with left atrial volume index >34ml/m2), reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). In this predominantly cross-sectional analysis, we analysed the association between NT-proBNP with SBHF, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, blood pressure and antihypertensive medication. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess discrimination of NT-proBNP for SBHF and various thresholds were applied. Results Among 441 long-term survivors (mean age 65.0±8.9 years, 85.7% female), elevated NT-proBNP levels were associated with SBHF (OR 1.63 [95%CI 1.20-2.22], p=0.002) and reduced GLS (adjusted OR 1.81 [1.32-2.50], p<0.001), whereas associations with diastolic dysfunction, LVH, and reduced LVEF were not significant. Discriminatory performances of NT-proBNP for SBHF and its subtypes were poor, with AUCs ranging from 0.60 to 0.64. The conventional threshold (>125pg/mL) demonstrated inadequate sensitivity (42.7%) and specificity (68.2%). Lower thresholds (>55pg/mL) improved sensitivity (82.3%) but reduced specificity (30.3%). Conclusion The poor sensitivity of NT-proBNP for SBHF limits its effectiveness as a standalone screening tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soh et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stage B heart failure (n=441). Elevated NT-proBNP levels was evaluated on Stage B heart failure (SBHF) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20-2.22, p=0.002). Elevated NT-proBNP levels were associated with stage B heart failure, but discriminatory performance was poor.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: