Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature review demonstrates circular economy strategies advance sustainable development across global supply chains, highlighting the need for systemic multi-stakeholder collaboration.
The traditional linear economic model of “take, make and dispose” has played an important role in industrial development, but its dependence on continuous extraction and disposal of resources is creating increasing environmental and economic pressures. Rising material consumption, climate change, biodiversity loss and waste generation demonstrate the need for a different approach to production and consumption. The circular economy offers such an approach by keeping products, components and materials in use for longer, preventing waste and pollution, and regenerating natural systems. This research article examines the relationship between the circular economy and sustainable development, with particular emphasis on the barriers that limit implementation and the solutions required to overcome them. The study is based on a review of academic literature and reports from international organisations, particularly the United Nations and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It argues that recycling alone cannot deliver a circular economy. Product design, repair, reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, circular business models, extended producer responsibility, green finance and consumer participation are equally important. The article concludes that a circular economy can make a substantial contribution to sustainable development, but only if governments, businesses and consumers work together to transform production and consumption systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drakshayani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: