Why the study?
Does adjunctive thrombus aspiration and mechanical protection improve angiographic outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute MI?
Does adjunctive thrombus aspiration and mechanical protection improve angiographic outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute MI?
Adjunctive thrombus aspiration and mechanical protection during primary PCI for acute MI is feasible and provides excellent immediate angiographic results without intraprocedural complications.
Supports feasibility in select acute MI cases; leaves open efficacy of routine thrombus aspiration in primary PCI.
Primary percutaneous intervention for acute occlusion of a native coronary artery may be complicated by distal embolization of plaque or thrombotic debris, with infarct extension. We tested the clinical application of a new therapeutic strategy combining maximal antiplatelet therapy, with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, and adjunctive mechanical protection from distal embolization and direct aspiration of thrombus with a new balloon and catheter system (PercuSurge™). Successful aspiration of thrombus could be obtained in 7 out of 8 attempted procedures, with inability to negotiate the angulated take-off of the circumflex coronary artery in one patient. The current mechanical characteristics of the device, primarily developed for use in larger saphenous vein grafts, and certain caveats and limitations are discussed. New dedicated systems should be available in the near future for the native coronary circulation. Excellent immediate angiographic results were obtained in all treated patients, without evidence of loss of distal branches and no intraprocedural complications. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 50:362–370, 2000.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belli et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: