Key result
Home blood pressure monitoring was feasible and increased the detection of hypertension to 34% compared to 11% with usual care in women with a history of preeclampsia (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk more than doubles after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but whether home blood pressure monitoring is feasible for early detection and management of hypertension in women with prior preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome was unknown.
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve the detection of hypertension in women with a history of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome?
RCT (n=198)
randomized
Yes
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve the detection of hypertension in women with a history of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome?
Home blood pressure monitoring is feasible and significantly increases the detection of unrevealed hypertension while lowering blood pressure levels in women with a history of preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome.
Supports home BP monitoring in post-preeclampsia follow-up; extends RCT evidence on hypertension detection to this high-risk group.
The risk of cardiovascular disease more than doubles after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. As early onset chronic hypertension contributes to cardiovascular risk, implementation of screening strategies, using home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), may help to improve long-term cardiovascular health. We evaluated whether HBPM among women with a history of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome is feasible for early detection and management of hypertension. The BP-PRESELF study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to intervention group with HBPM for the duration of 1 year or the control group with 'usual care'. The primary outcome was feasibility of HBPM during 1 year of follow-up, defined as protocol adherence, protocol persistence and patient acceptance. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure levels and prevalence of hypertension. We recruited 198 women with a mean age of 45 years. Protocol adherence decreased during the first 6 months, after which it stabilized. Protocol persistence remained high throughout follow-up. During the study period, 33 women (34%) in the intervention group were diagnosed with hypertension versus only 10 women (11%) in the control group, P<0.001. At 1-year follow-up, mean systolic blood pressure (SD) was 120.4 (11.6) mmHg in the intervention group versus 126.1 (14.3) mmHg in the control group, P=0.003. Mean diastolic blood pressure (SD) values were 77.1 (8.0) mmHg versus 81.7 (9.4) mmHg, P<0.001, respectively. Adjusted systolic and diastolic differences (95% confidence interval) were -6.81 (-10.17, -3.45) and -4.93 (-7.26, -2.61) mm Hg, with 80% less hypertension at 1-year follow-up in the intervention group. HBPM appears to be feasible for follow-up of blood pressure in women after preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome, while it detected hypertension and blood pressure levels reduced in one-third of women in this group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muijsers et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in history of preeclampsia/HELLP syndrome (n=198). Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) vs. usual care was evaluated on feasibility of HBPM during 1 year of follow-up, defined as protocol adherence, protocol persistence and patient acceptance. Home blood pressure monitoring was feasible and increased the detection of hypertension to 34% compared to 11% with usual care in women with a history of preeclampsia (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: