Key result
A computational patient-specific model accurately predicted stent-graft positions in 10 patients undergoing EVAR, with relative radial deviations of 6.3 ± 4.4%.
Why the study?
EVAR proximal sealing complications causing endoleaks and migration occur particularly in unfavorable aortic anatomies, prompting the need for a computational patient-specific model to predict these complications.
Does a computational patient-specific model accurately predict stent-graft positions in patients undergoing EVAR?
Does a computational patient-specific model accurately predict stent-graft positions in patients undergoing EVAR?
A patient-specific computational model can accurately predict stent-graft positions in EVAR, potentially helping to anticipate proximal endoleak complications.
Patient-specific EVAR models are feasible; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms in most centers. However, proximal sealing complications leading to endoleaks and migrations sometimes occur, particularly in unfavorable aortic anatomies and are strongly dependent on biomechanical interactions between the aortic wall and the endograft. The objective of the present work is to develop and validate a computational patient-specific model that can accurately predict these complications. METHODS: Based on pre-operative CT-scans, we developed finite element models of the aorta of 10 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, 7 with standard morphologies and 3 with unfavorable anatomies. We simulated the deployment of stent grafts in each aorta by solving mechanical equilibrium with a virtual shell method. Eventually we compared the actual stent ring positions from post-operative computed-tomography-scans with the predicted simulated positions. RESULTS: A successful deployment simulation could be performed for each patient. Relative radial, transverse and longitudinal deviations were 6.3 ± 4.4%, 2.5 ± 0.9 mm and 1.4 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The numerical model predicted accurately stent-graft positions in the aortic neck of 10 patients, even in complex anatomies. This shows the potential of computer simulation to anticipate possible proximal endoleak complications before EVAR interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derycke et al. (2023) studied Abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=10). Computational patient-specific finite element model vs. Actual stent ring positions from post-operative CT-scans was evaluated on Deviation between predicted simulated positions and actual stent ring positions. A computational patient-specific model accurately predicted stent-graft positions in 10 patients undergoing EVAR, with relative radial deviations of 6.3 ± 4.4%.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: