Key result
The STS Score was the best overall predictor of operative mortality (c-statistic 0.850) and morbidity compared to EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery.
Why the study?
Do contemporary surgical risk scores (EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, STS Score) accurately predict operative mortality and morbidities in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=408)
No
Do contemporary surgical risk scores (EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, STS Score) accurately predict operative mortality and morbidities in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery?
All three contemporary surgical risk scores adequately discriminate mortality after mitral valve surgery, but the STS Score is the best overall predictor of mortality and morbidity, whereas EuroSCORE over-estimates operative mortality.
May support STS Score preference for mitral valve surgery risk assessment; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) is important in the decision-making for treating several mitral valve disease but is rarely studied. We compared the prognostic utility of EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score for MVR. METHODS: The three scores were retrospectively calculated for consecutive patients undergoing isolated MVR at Auckland City Hospital during 2005-2012 and their discrimination and calibration for mortality and morbidities assessed. RESULTS: There were 408 patients (mitral valve repair 48.1% and replacement 51.9%) followed-up for 6.0 ± 2.6 years. The operative mortality was 2.5%. Mean EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and STS Score were 7.6%, 3.4%, and 3.5%. C-statistics were 0.844, 0.817, and 0.850 for operative mortality. Hosmer-Lemeshow test p values were 0.076, 0.541, and 0.306, and Brier scores 0.0246, 0.0035, and 0.0075, respectively, for operative mortality. The numerically highest c-statistic for predicting complications include EuroSCORE for return to the operating room (c = 0.673); EuroSCORE II for stroke (c = 0.669) and mediastinitis (c = 0.801); and STS for renal failure (c = 0.828), ventilation >24 hours (c = 0.789), and composite morbidity (c = 0.732). The individual STS complication models for MVR had a numerically higher c-statistic only for stroke (c = 0.737). CONCLUSIONS: All scores discriminated mortality and most morbidities after MVR, although EuroSCORE over-estimated operative mortality. The STS Score was the best overall predictor of mortality and morbidity in the MVR cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease requiring surgery (n=408). STS Score, EuroSCORE, and EuroSCORE II was evaluated on Operative mortality. The STS Score was the best overall predictor of operative mortality (c-statistic 0.850) and morbidity compared to EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: