Key result
Mitral valve repair was associated with higher 3-year post-operative survival compared to mitral valve replacement (89% vs 74%).
Why the study?
Does mitral valve repair improve survival and reduce hospital stay compared to mitral valve replacement in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Cohort (n=378)
No
Does mitral valve repair improve survival and reduce hospital stay compared to mitral valve replacement in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Mitral valve repair is associated with lower mortality and shorter hospital stays compared to mitral valve replacement, despite increasing predicted surgical risk over time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support mitral repair over replacement for survival; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in valve surgery.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was undertaken in order to evaluate the usefulness of the Euroscore in the choice and outcome of mitral valve procedures undertaken at the Helsinki University Central Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 378 patients was collected. predicted mortalities were calculated for all patients using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and different mitral valve procedures were compared with 30-day mortality, length of hospital care and rate of post-operative complications. RESULTS: The mortality rate in the mitral valve repair (MVP) group decreased gradually from 5.9% (in 1999) to 2.2% (2003). The variation of annual mortality was higher in the mitral valve replacement (MVR) group. The predicted mortality given by Euroscore increased over the years in both groups. The mortality in the MVR group was nearly four times higher than in the MVP group. the length of both intensive and overall hospital stay decreased in patients with MVP procedures. Post-operative survival was 89% in the MVP patients and 74% in mvr patients after three years. DISCUSSION: The results of mitral valve operations have improved. This is observed as decreased mortality rates and lengths of hospital care in the MVP group, although the predicted mortality rate was increased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaartama et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease requiring surgery (n=378). Mitral valve repair vs. Mitral valve replacement was evaluated on Post-operative survival at 3 years. Mitral valve repair was associated with higher 3-year post-operative survival compared to mitral valve replacement (89% vs 74%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: