Key result
Higher STS predicted risk of mortality was significantly associated with lower 5-year survival (90.8% for low, 75.5% for intermediate, and 56.4% for high/extreme risk; P<.001) after isolated MVR.
Why the study?
Mitral valve replacement carries significant operative risk, and the study aimed to evaluate the long-term (5-year) predictive capabilities of the STS predicted risk of mortality in isolated MVR patients.
Does the STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) score predict 5-year mortality in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement?
Cohort (n=855)
No
Does the STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) score predict 5-year mortality in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement?
p-value: p=<.001
The STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) score effectively correlates with 5-year survival in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve replacement, aiding in long-term risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve replacement (MVR) is recognized for its significant operative risks. This risk is commonly quantified with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Risk Calculator. The present study aimed to investigate the long-term (5-year) predictive capabilities of the STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) in patients undergoing isolated MVR. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated MVR at a high-volume mitral reference center from 2010-2023 were stratified by STS PROM (low: <3%, intermediate: 3%-6%, and high/extreme: >6%). Primary endpoints were short-term (30-day) and long-term (5-year) mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare short- and long-term survival among risk stratified groups. Cox regression modeling was used to identify predictors of long-term survival. RESULTS: Of 1444 of MVR patients, 855 patients underwent isolated MVR. The mean STS PROM for low, intermediate, and high/extreme-risk groups was 1.7%, 4.3%, and 12.7%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was lower than predicted in the low (0.3%) and high/extreme risk (10.9%) groups. Five-year survival was 90.8%, 75.5%, and 56.4% respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 5 years identified significant long-term survival probability differences among the PROM groups, even after accounting for perioperative risk (P < .001). Preoperative dialysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% CI 1.05-2.73; P = .03), hypertension (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.59; P = .011), and urgent operative status (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.26; P = .02) were among the characteristics associated with worse long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although predictive models may overestimate surgical risk at high-volume mitral centers, the STS PROM correlates with 5-year mortality in isolated MVR. These findings may provide more specific risk stratification criteria, identifying patients best suited for operative intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazaleh et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Isolated mitral valve replacement (n=855). STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) vs. Low (<3%), intermediate (3%-6%), and high/extreme (>6%) risk was evaluated on Short-term (30-day) and long-term (5-year) mortality (p=<.001). Higher STS predicted risk of mortality was significantly associated with lower 5-year survival (90.8% for low, 75.5% for intermediate, and 56.4% for high/extreme risk; P<.001) after isolated MVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: