Key result
Two types of Poli-Valves met the minimum ISO 5840 Standard requirements for regurgitation and effective orifice area when compared to 5 mechanical and 5 tissue heart valves.
In vitro testing demonstrates that novel polymeric heart valves made from styrenic block copolymers meet ISO standards for hydrodynamic performance, indicating potential as a future alternative to mechanical and biological valves.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poli-valves meet ISO hydrodynamic standards in vitro; leaves open translation to durable clinical performance.
PURPOSE: Only mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses are currently commercially available. The former show longer durability but require anticoagulant therapy; the latter display better fluid dynamic behavior but do not have adequate durability. New Polymeric Heart Valves (PHVs) could potentially combine the hemodynamic properties of biological valves with the durability of mechanical valves. This work presents a hydrodynamic evaluation of 2 groups of newly developed supra-annular, trileaflet prosthetic heart valves made from styrenic block copolymers (SBC): Poli-Valves. METHODS: 2 types of Poli-Valves made of SBC and differing in polystyrene fraction content were tested under continuous and pulsatile flow conditions as prescribed by ISO 5840 Standard. A pulse duplicator designed ad hoc allowed the valve prototypes to be tested at different flow rates and frequencies. Pressure and flow were recorded; pressure drops, effective orifice area (EOA), and regurgitant volume were computed to assess the behavior of the valve. RESULTS: Both types of Poli-Valves met the minimum requirements in terms of regurgitation and EOA as specified by the ISO 5840 Standard. Results were compared with 5 mechanical heart valves (MHVs) and 5 tissue heart valves (THVs), currently available on the market. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, PHVs based on styrenic block copolymers, as are Poli-Valves, can be considered a promising alternative for heart valve replacement in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaetano et al. (2015) studied Heart valve replacement. Poli-Valves (polymeric heart valves) vs. Mechanical and tissue heart valves was evaluated on Pressure drops, effective orifice area (EOA), and regurgitant volume. Two types of Poli-Valves met the minimum ISO 5840 Standard requirements for regurgitation and effective orifice area when compared to 5 mechanical and 5 tissue heart valves.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: