Key result
Minimally invasive thromboaspiration achieves ~92% procedural success for left-sided cardiac masses.
Why the study?
Surgical removal of large intracardiac masses is often contraindicated in high-risk patients, making minimally invasive thromboaspiration a promising alternative for high-risk left-sided masses.
Does minimally invasive thromboaspiration safely and effectively remove left-sided cardiac masses in patients unfit for surgery?
Does minimally invasive thromboaspiration safely and effectively remove left-sided cardiac masses in patients unfit for surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Minimally invasive thromboaspiration is a viable, less invasive alternative for managing left-sided cardiac masses in patients unfit for surgery, demonstrating a 92% success rate in reported cases.
The management of large intracardiac masses, such as thrombi, tumors, or endocarditic vegetations, presents significant challenges due to their friable nature and the risks of embolization or hemodynamic compromise. While surgical removal remains the gold standard, it is often contraindicated in high-risk patients. Minimally invasive techniques, particularly thromboaspiration, offer a promising alternative, especially for left-sided cardiac chambers where systemic circulation and delicate anatomy heighten procedural risks. This review analyzes the evolving role of thromboaspiration for left-sided cardiac masses, focusing on 24 cases from 14 studies published between 2014 and 2024. Most cases utilized the AngioVac® system, with others employing devices such as Lasso®, Occlutech®, and Amplatz® systems. Neuroprotection was implemented in 79% of cases, primarily using Sentinel® devices. Access was predominantly transseptal, though transapical, transcaval, and femoral routes were also utilized. Notably, 88% of procedures were performed without ECMO support. The results highlight a high success rate (92%) in mass removal with minimal complications, although potential publication bias must be acknowledged. This success underscores thromboaspiration's viability not only for patients unfit for surgery but also for those with intracavitary or pedunculated thrombi. Thromboaspiration represents a less invasive, effective solution for managing left-sided cardiac masses, expanding its applicability beyond right-sided cases. This review emphasizes the need for further studies to establish standardized protocols and encourage broader adoption of this innovative technique in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunga et al. (2025) conducted a review in Left-sided cardiac masses (thrombi, tumors, endocarditic vegetations) (n=24). Minimally invasive thromboaspiration was evaluated on Procedural success (mass removal). Minimally invasive thromboaspiration for left-sided cardiac masses achieved a 92% procedural success rate with minimal complications across 24 published cases.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: