In order to investigate the deembedding uncertainties in the most commonly used deembedding methods, fmaxand fTdeembedded from two- and three-step ones are compared with those of an accurate pad-open-short technique requiring an additional pad open pattern. The lower fmaxand higher fTvalues from these deembedding methods than those of the pad-open-short technique considering the distributed effect are obtained in an actual MOSFET with Lg = 0.13 mum. The deembedding uncertainty of two- and three-step methods is reduced without the pad open pattern by a simple deembedding technique using extrinsic and intrinsic admittances in specific splitting fractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: