Key result
Geographic region was an independent predictor of thromboembolic events in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with the Hokuetsu region showing an 88% lower risk compared to the Shikoku region.
Why the study?
Does geographic region affect the frequency of warfarin therapy and thromboembolism in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=7,406)
Yes
Does geographic region affect the frequency of warfarin therapy and thromboembolism in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Significant regional differences exist in thromboembolic risk, warfarin use, and anticoagulation quality among Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with region being an independent predictor of thromboembolic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional AF thromboembolic disparities merit prospective validation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with anticoagulation varies from country to country. In Japan, little is known about regional differences in frequency of warfarin use or prognosis among patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In J-RHYTHM Registry, the number of patients recruited from each of 10 geographic regions of Japan was based on region population density. A total of 7,406 NVAF patients were followed up prospectively for 2 years. At baseline, significant differences in various clinical characteristics including age, sex, type of AF, comorbidity, and CHADS2score, were detected among the regions. The highest mean CHADS2score was recorded in Shikoku. Frequency of warfarin use differed between the regions (P<0.001), with lower frequencies observed in Hokkaido and Shikoku. Baseline prothrombin time international normalized ratio differed slightly but significantly between the regions (P<0.05). On univariate analysis, frequency of thromboembolic events differed among the regions (P<0.001), with the highest rate seen in Shikoku. An inverse correlation was detected between frequency of thromboembolic and of major hemorrhagic events (P=0.062). On multivariate analysis, region emerged as an independent risk for thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboembolic risk, frequency of warfarin use, and intensity and quality of warfarin treatment differed significantly between geographic regions of Japan. Region was found to be an independent predictor of thromboembolic events. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1548-1555).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=7,406). Geographic region (Hokuetsu) vs. Geographic region (Shikoku) was evaluated on Thromboembolic events (symptomatic ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism) (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.61, p=0.007). Geographic region was an independent predictor of thromboembolic events in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with the Hokuetsu region showing an 88% lower risk compared to the Shikoku region.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: