Key result
Exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference predicted 25% of the variation in resting interarm difference.
Why the study?
Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise is known to influence interarm blood pressure difference, but the relationship between resting and exercise interarm difference during prolonged steady-state aerobic exercise in IAD- and IAD+ individuals needed characterization.
Does exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference (eIAD) predict resting IAD and differ between individuals with and without resting IAD?
Observational (n=62)
Does exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference (eIAD) predict resting IAD and differ between individuals with and without resting IAD?
Exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference correlates with resting interarm difference and differs significantly between those with and without a resting difference, suggesting bilateral BP measurement during exercise may be important.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise-induced interarm BP differences may relate to resting values; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Blood pressure (BP) is used to aid in appropriate clinical decision making and monitor safe exercise participation. A large interarm difference (IAD) in systolic BP (≥10 mm Hg between arms; IAD+) at rest is associated with premature morbidity and mortality. Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise is known to influence IAD. Purpose The aims of the present study were to examine the relationship between resting IAD and exercise IAD (eIAD), and to characterize eIAD during a prolonged steady-state bout of aerobic exercise in IAD− (<10 mm Hg between arms at rest) and IAD+ individuals. Methods Sixty-two participants were studied on two separate occasions. On the initial visit, anthropometric measures and a V˙O 2peak test were completed. On the subsequent visit, participants cycled at 50% V˙O 2peak for 30 min. Heart rate and sequential bilateral BP were measured at rest; at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min of exercise; and during active recovery. Descriptive statistics are reported as mean and SEM. The value of eIAD in predicting IAD was determined using multiple linear regression analysis. Absolute values and the percent (%) change in eIAD, systolic BP (right and left arms), and heart rate during exercise were examined between both IAD− and IAD+ individuals using a repeated-measures ANOVA. Results The incidence of IAD+ at rest was 19%. Twenty-five percent of the variation in resting IAD was predicted by eIAD ( P < 0.05). There were significantly different absolute and relative eIAD, and SBP responses to exercise between IAD+ and IAD−. Conclusion There is a relationship between eIAD and resting IAD that warrants further attention. The eIAD response is inherently different between IAD− and IAD+ individuals. It may be important to measure BP bilaterally during aerobic exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walsh et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Interarm blood pressure difference (n=62). Exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference (eIAD) was evaluated on Variation in resting IAD predicted by eIAD (p=< 0.05). Exercise-induced interarm blood pressure difference predicted 25% of the variation in resting interarm difference.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: