Key result
Radial blood pressure measurement overestimates systolic values by ~17 mmHg vs brachial in large arms.
Why the study?
Radial blood pressure cuffs have recently been developed for individuals with large arm circumferences, but unique hypertension thresholds for radial assessment have not been defined.
Does radial blood pressure measurement differ from brachial blood pressure measurement in adults with large arm circumferences?
Cross-Sectional (n=88)
Randomized order of measurement
Yes
Does radial blood pressure measurement differ from brachial blood pressure measurement in adults with large arm circumferences?
In individuals with large arm circumferences, radial blood pressure measurements are substantially higher than brachial measurements, suggesting that unique diagnostic thresholds may be required when using radial cuffs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Radial measurements warrant caution in large-arm adults; leaves open validation of outcome-linked thresholds.
Recently, radial blood pressure cuffs have been developed for use among individuals with large arm circumferences although unique hypertension thresholds for radial assessment are not defined. We compared systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured from the upper arm and forearm among individuals with obesity. In a sub-study of participants who were living with HIV and without HIV with upper arm circumference > 40 cm ( n = 88, 2022–2023) in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women’s Interagency HIV Study-Combined Cohort Study, both brachial and radial BP were measured with an automated monitor using a thigh cuff and a forearm cuff, respectively. Among 88 participants, 81% were female, 90% were Black, and 72% were living with HIV. The correlation between radial and brachial measurements was 0.60 for systolic and 0.69 for diastolic blood pressure. Average radial values were higher than brachial values for both systolic (16.5 mmHg higher: 148.3 versus 131.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and diastolic (13.2 mmHg higher: 85.2 versus 72.0 mmHg, p < 0.001) blood pressure. When measured in the same participants, radial blood pressure was substantially higher than brachial blood pressure. When measuring radial blood pressure, a different threshold for hypertension diagnosis or use of a model to estimate brachial blood pressure may be needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blair et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Large arm circumference (n=88). Radial blood pressure measurement vs. Brachial blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (MD 16.5, 95% CI 12.9-20.1, p=<0.001). Radial blood pressure measurement yielded substantially higher systolic values (mean difference 16.5 mmHg) compared to brachial measurement in adults with large arm circumferences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: