Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 5, 2013PLoS ONEOpen Access

Mouse Strain Determines Cardiac Growth Potential

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

The DBA/2 mouse strain demonstrated a more immature cardiac phenotype, including a higher percentage of cardiac progenitor cells (4.2% vs 2.5%) and a greater hypertrophic response to isoproterenol.

Why the study?

Does mouse strain (C57BL/6 vs DBA/2) determine cardiac growth potential and response to hypertrophic stimulation?

Population

C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mouse strains

Comparison

2-week isoproterenol stimulation vs Unstimulated controls and between-strain…

Design

Preclinical

Follow-up

2 weeks

Authors

CKCarmen KiperAtrium Health Wake Forest BaptistBGBarry GrimesUniversity of KentuckyGZGary Van ZantTexas Tech University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Strain choice may alter cardiac phenotype and hypertrophy in mice; leaves open optimal models for heart disease research.

Structured PICO

Does mouse strain (C57BL/6 vs DBA/2) determine cardiac growth potential and response to hypertrophic stimulation?

P
Population
Female C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice aged 3 weeks to 2 years were evaluated to determine the effect of genetic strain on cardiac growth potential and response to isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy.
E
Exposure
2-week isoproterenol stimulation
C
Comparator
Unstimulated controls and between-strain comparison (C57BL/6 vs DBA/2)
O
Outcome
Heart growth and cardiomyocyte characteristics (dimensions, nucleation, turnover, cell size, ANF expression)surrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 2.5%

p-value: p=<0.05

The DBA/2 mouse strain exhibits a more immature cardiac phenotype and a greater hypertrophic response to isoproterenol compared to C57BL/6, highlighting the critical role of genetic background in selecting mouse models for heart disease research.

Limitations

  • All dividing cells and apoptotic cells were measured without distinguishing between cardiomyocytes, cardiac progenitor cells, or fibroblasts.
  • The use of single time-points provides only a snapshot view of the changes in proportions of nucleated cardiomyocytes.

Cite This Study

Kiper et al. (2013) studied Cardiac hypertrophy and aging. DBA/2 genetic background vs. C57BL/6 genetic background was evaluated on Percentage of c-kit+ cardiac progenitor cells at 8 weeks (p=<0.05). The DBA/2 mouse strain demonstrated a more immature cardiac phenotype, including a higher percentage of cardiac progenitor cells (4.2% vs 2.5%) and a greater hypertrophic response to isoproterenol.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a95772e6f34f99aa2331bfehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070512

Topics

Echocardiography
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mouse strain determines the outcome of wound healing after myocardial infarction2009 · 155 citations
  2. 2Hyperplasia of myocyte nuclei in long-term cardiac hypertrophy in rats.1987 · 68 citations
  3. 3Spontaneous Calcium Oscillations Regulate Human Cardiac Progenitor Cell Growth2009 · 90 citations
  4. 4Cardiomyocyte Death and the Ageing and Failing Heart2003 · 109 citations
  5. 5Isoproterenol-induced myocardial fibrosis in relation to myocyte necrosis.1989 · 345 citations