Key result
The combined elevation of serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP was associated with a significantly higher rate of heart failure diagnosis (97.1%) compared to when both markers were below their respective cutoff values (38.5%).
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of serum glypican-6 levels and the combination of NT-ProBNP and glypican-6 in diagnosing heart failure.
Does the combination of serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP improve the diagnosis of heart failure in patients admitted to the emergency department?
Observational (n=85)
No
Does the combination of serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP improve the diagnosis of heart failure in patients admitted to the emergency department?
The combined use of serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP may improve the diagnostic accuracy for heart failure in patients presenting to the emergency department compared to either biomarker alone.
Should not yet change ED practice; hypothesis-generating for combined GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP in HF diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of serum glypican-6 (GPC-6) levels and the combination of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) and GPC-6 in the diagnosis of heart failure (HF). METHODS: In this prospective study, patients older than 18 years of age, admitted to the emergency department of our hospital between December 2021 and April 2022, diagnosed with heart failure (patient group), and healthy volunteers with similar sociodemographic characteristics (control group) were included. The disease severity classification of the patient group was made according to the 2021 ESC guidelines, using echocardiographic findings. Serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP levels were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method, which determines the antigen-antibody relationship. Optimal GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP levels for the diagnosis of HF were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The patients were divided into three groups according to these levels. Group 1 consisted of patients with both markers below the cutoff values, Group 2 consisted of patients with either of these markers above the cutoff values, and Group 3 consisted of patients with both markers above the cutoff values. RESULTS: The study included 65 heart failure patients and 20 healthy volunteers. When the patient and control groups were compared in terms of serum GPC-6 and serum NT-ProBNP levels, both parameters were evaluated as significantly higher in the patient group (p=0.038 and p<0.001; respectively). In the ROC analysis, it was determined that GPC-6 indicated HF with 58.46% sensitivity and 75% specificity for an optimal cutoff value of 390 pg/ml. In the ROC analysis, it was determined that serum NT-ProBNP indicated HF with 89.23% sensitivity and 70% specificity for an optimal cutoff value of 122 pg/ml. When the groups were compared according to the rate of HF, it was found to be higher in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (97.1% vs. 70.3%, p<0.002) and Group 1 (97.1% vs. 38.5%, p<0.001). This rate was seen to be significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (70.3% vs. 38.5%, p=0.042). CONCLUSION: The combination of GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP may help diagnose HF patients admitted to the emergency department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sağlam et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=85). Combined elevation of serum GPC-6 (>390 pg/ml) and NT-ProBNP (>122 pg/ml) vs. Both markers below cutoff values was evaluated on Rate of heart failure diagnosis (p=<0.001). The combined elevation of serum GPC-6 and NT-ProBNP was associated with a significantly higher rate of heart failure diagnosis (97.1%) compared to when both markers were below their respective cutoff values (38.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: