Key result
The Arabic version of the KCCQ demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.97; p<0.001) and correlated significantly with the MLHF and 6MWT in patients with CHF.
Why the study?
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is widely used to assess health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure, but its reliability and validity needed evaluation in Arabic patients.
Is the Arabic version of the KCCQ a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in Arabic patients with chronic heart failure?
Observational (n=101)
Is the Arabic version of the KCCQ a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in Arabic patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97)
p-value: p=< 0.001
The Arabic version of the KCCQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing health-related quality of life in Arabic-speaking patients with chronic heart failure.
Supports Arabic KCCQ for CHF research; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is the most specific and widely used questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic heart failure (CHF). This study aimed to examine reliability and validity of the KCCQ in Arabic patients with CHF. Material and Methods: Patients with CHF filled out the Arabic versions of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) and KCCQ questionnaire, and performed a six-minute walk test (6MWT) on their first visit. On the return, the patients filled out the KCCQ along with the global rating of change (GRC) scale. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity were examined. Results: A total of 101 Arabic patients with CHF, with a mean (SD) age of 55 (11) years old, completed the study. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97, and the ICC2,1 = 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92 to 0.97, p < 0.001). The Arabic version of KCCQ was correlated with the MLHF (r = −0.57, p = 0.01) and with the 6MWT (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Arabic version of KCCQ is a reliable and valid measure of HRQoL, which could be utilized in routine clinical practice for Arabic-speaking patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albarrati et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Chronic Heart Failure (n=101). Arabic version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) was evaluated on Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.97, p=< 0.001). The Arabic version of the KCCQ demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.97; p<0.001) and correlated significantly with the MLHF and 6MWT in patients with CHF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: