BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors activated by a tethered ligand amino acid sequence within the amino terminal that is revealed by site-specific proteolysis. In the vascular endothelium, activation of PAR-2 by treatment with trypsin or by using the amino acid ligand sequence (SLIGRL) produces endothelium-dependent relaxation of isolated noncerebral vascular segments. In this study, we first tested whether PAR-2 activation produces cerebral vasodilatation in vivo and then examined whether PAR-2-mediated vasodilatation is dependent on the production of nitric oxide. METHODS: Concentration-dependent vasodilator effects of the PAR-2 agonist peptide SLIGRL and trypsin were examined on the basilar artery using a cranial window in anesthetized rats. In addition, the vasodilator effects of SLIGRL, acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were examined in the absence and presence of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, and 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-l-one (ODQ), an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase. RESULTS: Baseline diameter of the basilar artery averaged 239+/-4 microm. Under control conditions, SLIGRL (10(-6) to 10(-4) mol/L) and trypsin (0.01 to 10 U/mL) produced concentration-dependent vasodilator responses. In time-control experiments, SLIGRL (3 x 10(-6) and 10(-5) mol/L), ACh (10(-6) and 10(-5) mol/L), and SNP (10(-8) and 10(-7) mol/L) elicited reproducible dilatation of the basilar artery. In another group of rats, L-NNA (10(-4) mol/L) markedly inhibited dilator responses to both SLIGRL (13+/-3% versus 1+/-1% and 39+/-7% versus 11+/-2%; both P<0.05) and ACh (8+/-1% versus 0+/-0% and 13+/-2% versus 3+/-1%; both P<0.05). By contrast, responses to SNP were significantly augmented after treatment with L-NNA (P<0.05 versus control), indicating that inhibitory effects of L-NNA were specific for responses mediated by endogenous nitric oxide. Furthermore, in another group ODQ (10(-5) mol/L) inhibited responses to SLIGRL to a degree similar to that seen with L-NNA, consistent with a mechanism of PAR-2-mediated vasodilatation that involves activation of guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine whether PAR-2-mediated vasodilatation is functional in cerebral arteries and is also the first to directly assess the effects of PAR-2 activation on vascular tone in vivo. The results suggest that activation of PAR-2 is an effective and powerful vasodilator mechanism in cerebral arteries in vivo. Cerebral vasodilator responses to PAR-2 activation are mediated by nitric oxide and are likely to be endothelium dependent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobey et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: