Why the study?
Does measurement of end-tidal oxygen concentration better determine adequate preoxygenation time compared to patient factor assessment in elective surgical patients?
Does measurement of end-tidal oxygen concentration better determine adequate preoxygenation time compared to patient factor assessment in elective surgical patients?
Routine three-minute preoxygenation may be insufficient for many patients, and end-tidal oxygen measurement is a useful method to determine the end-point.
Fixed preoxygenation times may leave many patients underprepared; hypothesis-generating for end-tidal oxygen guidance versus patient factors.
Time to adequate preoxygenation was assessed in 200 elective surgical patients, using measurement of end-tidal oxygen concentration. A variety of patient factors were assessed as to their ability to predict the time required to preoxygenate a patient. Of the 200 patients, 23 (11.5%) were unable to be adequately preoxygenated; most of these cases were due to a poor mask fit. The average time for preoxygenation was 154 seconds (range 43-364 seconds). Of those patients who could be preoxygenated, 46 (23%) required more than three minutes. Although a regression equation could be constructed to calculate time required for preoxygenation, the wide standard errors of the coefficients preclude a clinically useful predictive equation. We thus found that we could not accurately predict time required for preoxygenation and that a routine three minutes preoxygenation may not be sufficient for many patients. However, the measurement of end-tidal oxygen concentration is a very useful method of determining the end-point for preoxygenation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machlin et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: