Key result
During a mean 10-year follow-up after radiofrequency ablation for AVNRT, no recurrences were observed after 3 years, but 24% of patients developed new arrhythmias or late AV block.
Why the study?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT cause long-term proarrhythmic effects or new arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=120)
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT cause long-term proarrhythmic effects or new arrhythmias?
While RF ablation for AVNRT provides excellent long-term cure rates, it is associated with a 24% incidence of new arrhythmias or late AV block over 10 years, suggesting potential long-term proarrhythmic effects of RF energy.
May warrant extended surveillance for late arrhythmias after AVNRT ablation; leaves open whether RF energy induces proarrhythmia.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is highly effective with a low complication rate. However, lesions created by RF energy are irreversible, inhomogeneous, and therefore potentially proarrhythmic. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the magnitude and importance of long-term proarrhythmic effects of RF energy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1995, 120 patients underwent RF ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Patient data were collected by contacting patients and/or filling out a questionnaire, and medical files were screened for recurrent, documented arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment, and repeated EP study. Referring cardiologists were asked about recurrences of tachyarrhythmias. Fourteen patients (11%) were lost to follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 10 years, six patients died. Recurrences of AVNRT were not any more observed after 3 years after ablation. A total of 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias, 6 from type 1 atrial flutter, 6 from atrial tachycardia, 9 from atrial fibrillation, and finally 16 from symptomatic premature atrial contractions (PACs), needing medical treatment or a combination of these arrhythmias. Nine patients underwent pacemaker implantation, 4 after developing procedural atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances, 2 after His ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation, 1 patient for sick sinus syndrome, and another 2 patients after developing late AV block, respectively, 7 and 9 years after ablation. CONCLUSION: During long-term follow-up after RF ablation for AVNRT, no AVNRT recurrences were observed, but 29 patients (24%) suffered from new arrhythmias or late AV block. This potential proarrhythmic effect of RF energy promotes the application of alternative energy sources for ablative therapies for cardiac arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimman et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=120). Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation was evaluated on New arrhythmias. During a mean 10-year follow-up after radiofrequency ablation for AVNRT, no recurrences were observed after 3 years, but 24% of patients developed new arrhythmias or late AV block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: