Key result
Vagal stimulation showed encouraging feasibility and safety in pilot studies for heart failure, with an ongoing pivotal clinical trial expected to provide definitive efficacy assessment.
Why the study?
Does vagal stimulation improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-advanced heart failure?
Does vagal stimulation improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-advanced heart failure?
Vagal stimulation represents a promising non-pharmacological approach to modulate the autonomic nervous system in moderate-to-advanced heart failure, with pivotal trials currently ongoing.
An imbalance of the autonomic nervous system, with reduced vagal and increased sympathetic activity, contributes to pathogenesis and clinical deterioration in heart failure (HF). Experimental studies have demonstrated that vagal stimulation (VS) has an antifibrillatory effect that has proved beneficial in animal models of HF. The potential value of chronic VS in man was first investigated with an implantable neuro-stimulator capable of delivering low current pulses with adjustable parameters to stimulate the right vagus. The results of a pilot study and a small multicentre clinical trial of VS in HF patients appeared to show a favourable clinical effect, and feasibility and safety data were encouraging. An ongoing pivotal clinical trial will provide a definitive assessment of the efficacy and usefulness of chronic VS in HF patients.This approach represents a new and exciting possibility for the management of HF that will provide clinicians with a novel tool to modulate non-pharmacologically the autonomic nervous system in patients with moderate-to-advanced HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter J. Schwartz (2014) conducted a review in Heart failure. Vagal stimulation was evaluated. Vagal stimulation showed encouraging feasibility and safety in pilot studies for heart failure, with an ongoing pivotal clinical trial expected to provide definitive efficacy assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: