Key result
Spinal cord stimulation significantly reduced the low-frequency/high-frequency ratio compared to when turned off (0.54 vs 1.21; P=0.036), indicating a reduction in sympathetic modulation.
Why the study?
Does spinal cord stimulation reduce sympathetic activity measured by heart rate variability in patients with refractory angina?
RCT (n=8)
randomized fashion
Does spinal cord stimulation reduce sympathetic activity measured by heart rate variability in patients with refractory angina?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.54% vs 1.21%
p-value: p=0.036
Spinal cord stimulation significantly reduces sympathetic modulation in patients with refractory angina, providing a mechanistic explanation for its antianginal effects.
Supports SCS consideration in refractory angina via sympathetic attenuation; confirms mechanism in this RCT.
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has proven antianginal and antiischemic effects in severe coronary artery disease patients, minimizing frequency, intensity, and duration of pain. The mechanism explaining these effects has been detected in a sympathicolytic effect of the SCS. We monitored 30-minute-long recordings of the heart rate variability (HRV) and its spectral power parameters to evaluate the influence of SCS on the sympathetic/parasympathetic balance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients underwent HRV recordings in controlled environmental conditions. The patients were seated in a relaxed position and isolated from external contacts. During three consecutive 30-minute periods, the SCS was programmed, in a randomized fashion, to stimulate at a level generating paresthesias (ON), at a subliminal level (SUB, amplitude 80% of ON), or switched off (OFF). The low-frequency/high-frequency ratio during stimulation (ON) was significantly lower compared to that found while the SCS was turned OFF (0.54, 0.35-1.04 vs 1.21, 0.80-2.48; P = 0.036). The stimulation resulted in a median 52% (33-65%) reduction of the sympathetic activity compared to basal (ON vs OFF, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: No difference emerged instead comparing OFF versus SUB (P = 0.575). The stimulation effect was not influenced by the randomized sequence. Thirty-minute SCS significantly influenced the sympathetic/parasympathetic balance reducing sympathetic modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anselmino et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Refractory Angina (n=8). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) vs. switched off (OFF) or subliminal level (SUB) was evaluated on low-frequency/high-frequency ratio (p=0.036). Spinal cord stimulation significantly reduced the low-frequency/high-frequency ratio compared to when turned off (0.54 vs 1.21; P=0.036), indicating a reduction in sympathetic modulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: