Key result
The ACASA-TAVI trial is designed to compare anti-factor Xa NOAC monotherapy versus single antiplatelet therapy for 12 months in 360 patients after successful TAVI.
Why the study?
The optimal antithrombotic regimen after TAVI is unknown, and a dedicated randomized trial comparing NOAC monotherapy to single antiplatelet therapy had not been conducted.
Does anti-factor Xa NOAC monotherapy reduce Hypo-Attenuated Leaflet Thickening and improve safety compared to acetylsalicylic acid in patients after successful TAVI without indication for oral anticoagulation?
RCT (n=360)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
1:1
Yes
Does anti-factor Xa NOAC monotherapy reduce Hypo-Attenuated Leaflet Thickening and improve safety compared to acetylsalicylic acid in patients after successful TAVI without indication for oral anticoagulation?
The ACASA-TAVI trial will determine if anti-factor Xa NOAC monotherapy reduces bioprosthetic valve dysfunction and improves clinical outcomes compared to aspirin after TAVI in patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation.
Will clarify optimal antithrombotic regimen after TAVI; extends RCT evidence to patients without anticoagulation indication.
BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) is associated with adverse outcomes and may be prevented by anticoagulation therapy. A dedicated randomized trial comparing monotherapy NOAC to single antiplatelet therapy has not been performed previously. We hypothesize that therapy with any anti-factor Xa NOAC will reduce BVD compared to antiplatelet therapy, without compromising safety. METHODS: ACASA-TAVI is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, all-comers trial comparing a monotherapy anti-factor Xa NOAC strategy (intervention arm) with a single antiplatelet therapy strategy (control arm) after successful TAVI. Three-hundred and sixty patients without indication for oral anticoagulation will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either apixaban 5 mg twice per day, edoxaban 60 mg daily, or rivaroxaban 20 mg daily for 12 months followed by acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg daily indefinitely, or to acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg daily indefinitely. The 2 co-primary outcomes are (1) incidence of Hypo-Attenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT) on 4-dimensional cardiac CT at 12 months, and (2) a Safety Composite of VARC-3 bleeding events, thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), and death from any cause, at 12 months. RESULTS: , and 15% were smokers. A balloon-expanded valve was used in 82% and a self-expandable valve in 18%. CONCLUSIONS: The trial is planned, initiated, funded, and conducted without industry involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05035277.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodgson et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=360). Anti-factor Xa NOAC (apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) vs. Acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg daily was evaluated on Incidence of Hypo-Attenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT) on 4-dimensional cardiac CT and a safety composite of VARC-3 bleeding events, thromboembolic events, and death from any cause at 12 months. The ACASA-TAVI trial is designed to compare anti-factor Xa NOAC monotherapy versus single antiplatelet therapy for 12 months in 360 patients after successful TAVI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: