Why the study?
To determine accessory pathway characteristics in pediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome undergoing atrial fibrillation induction during electrophysiologic study.
Does induction of atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic study accurately risk stratify pediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Observational (n=321)
Does induction of atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic study accurately risk stratify pediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Exclusive conduction through the atrioventricular node during induced atrial fibrillation on isoproterenol does not reliably exclude the presence of high-risk accessory pathways in pediatric patients with WPW syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AF induction on isoproterenol does not reliably exclude high-risk pathways in pediatric WPW; leaves open its accuracy for risk stratification.
Background: Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome is associated with sudden cardiac death from rapid conduction through the accessory pathway in atrial fibrillation. Adult patients are at higher risk for sudden cardiac death if the shortest-pre-excited-RR-interval in atrial fibrillation (SPERRI) is ≤250 milliseconds (msec) during electrophysiologic study. Exclusive conduction through the atrioventricular node in atrial fibrillation is presumed to convey lower risk. The shortest-pre-excited-paced-cycle-length with atrial pacing has also served as a marker for risk stratification. Objective: To determine accessory pathway characteristic of patients undergoing induction of atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic study. Methods: We reviewed 321 pediatric patients that underwent electrophysiologic study between 2010 and 2019. Induction of atrial fibrillation was attempted on patients while on isoproterenol and SPERRI was measured if atrial fibrillation was induced. Shortest-pre-excited-paced-cycle-length (SPPCL) was determined while on isoproterenol. Results: Atrial fibrillation was induced in 233 (73%) patients. Of those, 104 (45%) patients conducted exclusively through the atrioventricular node during atrial fibrillation (Group A). The remaining 129 (55%) patients had some conduction through the accessory pathway (Group B). In Group A, SPPCL was 260 msec with 48 (46%) conducting through the accessory pathway at ≤250 msec. In Group B, SPPCL was 240 msec with 92 patients (71%) conducting at ≤250 msec (p < 0.05). In Group B, SPERRI was 250 msec and had a positive correlation with SPPCL (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.28). Almost half (46%) of those with exclusive conduction through the atrioventricular node in atrial fibrillation had rapid accessory pathway conduction with atrial pacing. Conclusion: Conduction in atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic study on isoproterenol via the atrioventricular node may not exclude high-risk accessory pathways in pediatric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apfel et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (n=321). Exclusive conduction through the atrioventricular node during atrial fibrillation vs. Conduction through the accessory pathway during atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Shortest-pre-excited-paced-cycle-length (SPPCL) ≤250 msec (p=< 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: