Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chronic inhaled salmeterol improves FEV1 in symptomatic HFrEF without neurohormonal activation or ectopy; extends limited RCT safety data but needs larger outcome trials.
Inhaled β-agonists are commonly prescribed for the symptoms of exercise intolerance in heart failure despite a paucity of data regarding their safety and efficacy. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled 14-day cross-over study to determine if chronic inhaled salmeterol therapy 84 μg every 12 hours improved pulmonary function without augmentation of neurohormonal systems or ventricular ectopy in 8 symptomatic heart failure subjects with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and FEV1 ≤80%. The primary endpoint was FEV1, and the secondary endpoints were forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow (FEF25–75), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), blood pressure, heart rate, rate-pressure product, plasma norepinephrine, plasma epinephrine, plasma renin activity, percent ventricular ectopy, and salmeterol pharmacokinetics. Salmeterol was associated with a significant 6% improvement in FEV1 compared with placebo (salmeterol 2.46 ± 0.73 vs. placebo 2.33 ± 0.73 L, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in FVC, FEF25–75, and PEFR. Salmeterol increased mean rate-pressure product by 5% (salmeterol 8878 ± 1560 vs. placebo 8414 ± 1440 bpm × mm Hg, p = 0.04), although no increase in plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, plasma renin activity or ventricular ectopy was detected. The Tmax, Cmax, and half-life of salmeterol at steady-state were 5 min, 715 pg/ml and 11.4 hours, respectively. Inhaled salmeterol significantly improves FEV1 without producing measurable effects on neuroactivation or ventricular ectopy. Inhaled salmeterol causes minor increases in rate-pressure product, whose clinical significance remains to be determined. The plasma half-life of salmeterol may be prolonged in heart failure patients, thus leading to accumulation at steady-state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: