Key result
In a general population without baseline cardiovascular disease, complete right bundle branch block did not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular events (HR 1.02) or all-cause mortality compared to a normal ECG.
Why the study?
Right bundle branch block is common, but its prevalence, incidence, and effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population without cardiovascular events remained to be established.
Does right bundle branch block increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a general population without prior cardiovascular events?
Cohort (n=2,981)
Yes
Does right bundle branch block increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a general population without prior cardiovascular events?
Hazard Ratio: 1.02 (95% CI 0.68–1.52)
p-value: p=0.937
In a general Mediterranean population without prior cardiovascular disease, asymptomatic right bundle branch block does not significantly increase the risk of future cardiovascular events, suggesting no need for routine specialist referral.
Background: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is among the most common electrocardiographic abnormalities.Objectives: To establish the prevalence and incidence of RBBB in the general population without cardiovascular events (CVE) and whether RBBB increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with patients with a normal electrocardiogram (ECG).Methods: A historical study of two cohorts including 2981 patients from 29 primary health centres without baseline CVE. Cox (for CVE) and logistic (for cardiovascular factors) regression was used to assess their association with RBBB.Results: Of the patients (58% women; mean age 65.9), 92.2% had a normal ECG, 4.6% incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) and 3.2% complete RBBB (cRBBB). Mean follow-up was five years. Factors associated with appearance of cRBBB were male sex (HR = 3.8; 95%CI: 2.4–6.1) and age (HR = 1.05 per year; 95%CI: 1.03–1.08). In a univariate analysis, cRBBB was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality but only bifascicular block (BFB) was significant after adjusting for confounders. cRBBB tended to increase CVE but the results were not statistically significant. Presence of iRBBB was not associated with adverse outcomes. Patients with iRBBB who progressed to cRBBB showed a higher incidence of heart failure and chronic kidney disease.Conclusion: In this general population cohort with no CV disease, 8% had RBBB, with a higher prevalence among men and elderly patients. Although all-cause mortality and CVE tended to increase in the presence of cRBBB, only BFB showed a statistically significant association with cRBBB. Patients with iRBBB who progressed to cRBBB had a higher incidence of CVE. We detected no effect of iRBBB on morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alventosa-Zaidin et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in General population without baseline cardiovascular events (n=2,981). Complete right bundle branch block (cRBBB) vs. Normal ECG was evaluated on Any cardiovascular event (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68-1.52, p=0.937). In a general population without baseline cardiovascular disease, complete right bundle branch block did not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular events (HR 1.02) or all-cause mortality compared to a normal ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: