Key result
All-arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears yielded excellent or good outcomes in 21 of 24 patients, with an average UCLA clinical score of 31.84.
Why the study?
Rotator cuff problems are a common cause of shoulder pain, and the study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes following all-arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with suture anchors.
Does all-arthroscopic repair with suture anchors improve functional outcomes in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears?
Cohort (n=24)
Does all-arthroscopic repair with suture anchors improve functional outcomes in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears?
All-arthroscopic repair with suture anchors provides excellent or good functional outcomes in the majority of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
May support all-arthroscopic suture-anchor repair for full-thickness tears; leaves open need for RCTs versus alternatives.
Background: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint in the general population, mostly in the elderly. Among them, the rotator cuff problems are found to be most common causes. The treatment of rotator cuff pathology has progressed from open repair, first described by Codman in 1911 to arthroscopy assisted “mini open” techniques, to all arthroscopic repair techniques, first reported by Johnson who used metal staples while E.M. Wolf pioneered the first completely arthroscopic repair using suture anchors in 1990. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome following all arthroscopic repairs of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with suture anchors. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was done for 24 shoulders in 24 patients treated for full-thickness rotator cuff tear by all-arthroscopic repair between February 2014 and September 2015 and followed until May 2018. The results were evaluated using the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scoring system. Patients younger than 18 and over 80 and also those with bony lesion were excluded from the study as were those which might have confounded the outcome were excluded. Results: Among the 24 patients, the UCLA clinical scores were excellent in 12 patients, good in 9 patients, fair in 2 patients, and poor in 1 patient. The average UCLA score was 31.84. Conclusion: All-arthroscopic repair is an excellent treatment option for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, although with a steep learning curve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Full-thickness rotator cuff tear (n=24). All-arthroscopic repair with suture anchors was evaluated on University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scoring system. All-arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears yielded excellent or good outcomes in 21 of 24 patients, with an average UCLA clinical score of 31.84.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: