Key result
Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration was inducible in 75% (6/8) of patients, with incremental atrial pacing playing a significant role.
Why the study?
Can incremental atrial pacing induce bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration in patients with BBR-VT?
Observational (n=8)
Can incremental atrial pacing induce bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration in patients with BBR-VT?
Incremental atrial pacing during isoproterenol infusion is a feasible method for inducing bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration.
May support incremental atrial pacing for BBR-VT induction with RBBB morphology; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: We assessed the inducibility of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration in patients with BBR-VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight consecutive patients (5 men, 45+/-18 years old) with inducible BBR-VT were included. We evaluated the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics in these patients to explore the inducible factors of BBR-VT with an RBBB configuration. Six of eight patients had inducible BBR-VT with an RBBB configuration, including four patients with a clinical VT with the same QRS morphology. All patients exhibited an LBBB or RBBB type intraventricular conduction disturbance during sinus rhythm. The mean HV interval at baseline was 79+/-18 ms. The reproducibility of the BBR-VT with an RBBB pattern was achieved by incremental atrial pacing during an isoproterenol infusion in 4/6 patients (67%) and by programmed ventricular stimulation in the other two. After a right bundle ablation, the BBR-VT was no longer inducible in any of the cases. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that it is not rare to induce BBR-VT with an RBBB configuration. For the induction of an RBBB type BBR-VT, incremental atrial pacing may play a significant role in addition to ventricular pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizusawa et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT) (n=8). Incremental atrial pacing and programmed ventricular stimulation was evaluated on Inducibility of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration. Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration was inducible in 75% (6/8) of patients, with incremental atrial pacing playing a significant role.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: