Key result
Smartwatch rhythm tracking vs implantable event recorders for post-cryptogenic stroke AFib detection under study.
Why the study?
Prolonged rhythm monitoring significantly increases AFib detection to reduce recurrent stroke, but screening after stroke is currently suboptimal.
Does a smartwatch accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to an implantable event recorder in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA?
Does a smartwatch accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to an implantable event recorder in patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA?
This study protocol describes a prospective trial to determine if smartwatches can serve as a non-invasive, accurate alternative to implantable event recorders for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Smartwatches should not replace implantable recorders for AF detection in cryptogenic stroke; protocol leaves open diagnostic accuracy.
Rationale: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and subsequent anticoagulation therapy reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, while prolonged rhythm monitoring significantly increases AFib detection. Thus, prolonged smartwatch-based ECG monitoring after cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) could lead to a reduction of recurrent stroke by prompting adequate anticoagulation therapy. Aim: WATCH AFib investigates the accuracy of smartwatches for AFib detection in patients with cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke compared to an implantable event recorder. Sample size: 40 cases of AFib are required to estimate the sensitivity for AFib detection per patient with a precision of about 10%. As AFib is observed in 9%-16% of cryptogenic strokes, we intend to enroll 400 patients. Methods: WATCH AFib is a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA. ECG-data from smartwatches and event recorders is continuously monitored by two independent cardiologists for a follow-up period of 6 months. If AFib is detected, therapeutic options are discussed at the including center. Primary outcome: To compare smartwatch- and event recorder- based sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after 6 months. Discussion: Prolonged AFib screening after stroke is currently suboptimal. Smartwatches might be a non-invasive, cost-effective, widely available alternative for prolonged rhythm monitoring. Usability in severely affected patients and patients with persisting neurological deficits might be limited. Trial registration: The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Registration number: 20230726.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Penkert et al. (2025) studied Cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke (n=400). Smartwatch (Scanwatch, Withings) vs. Implantable event recorder was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after 6 months. This is a study protocol; no results are available yet regarding the accuracy of smartwatches for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke compared to implantable event recorders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: