Key result
Real-world HOCM patients with persistent LVOTO were older and had lower LVEF than the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, with 51.2% found eligible for mavacamten treatment.
Why the study?
Following the EXPLORER-HCM trial, the potential real-world use and eligibility of mavacamten remained to be defined by comparing real-world HOCM patients with trial participants.
Population
662 HOCM patients with persistent LVOTO followed at 25 Italian HCM outpatient clinics
Comparison
Real-world HOCM patients vs EXPLORER-HCM trial population
Design
Multicentre observational study
Authors
Loading...
Clinicians should note limited generalizability of EXPLORER-HCM to real-world HOCM; leaves open efficacy and safety questions in older patients with lower LVEF.
Observational (n=662)
Yes
Approximately half of real-world HOCM patients with persistent obstruction are eligible for mavacamten, but they represent a more advanced disease stage compared to the pivotal EXPLORER-HCM trial population.
Bertero et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM) (n=662). Real-world HOCM with persistent LVOTO vs. EXPLORER-HCM trial population was evaluated on Eligibility for treatment with mavacamten according to European guidelines. Real-world HOCM patients with persistent LVOTO were older and had lower LVEF than the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, with 51.2% found eligible for mavacamten treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: