Key result
HIV-1 drives Gag polyprotein synthesis via both a classical cap-dependent mechanism and an IRES, whereas HIV-2 and SIV exclusively use an IRES mechanism.
May guide subtype-specific antiviral strategies; leaves open translation to clinical efficacy or patient outcomes.
The full-length genomic RNA of lentiviruses can be translated to produce proteins and incorporated as genomic RNA in the viral particle. Interestingly, both functions are driven by the genomic 5'-UTR (5'-untranslated region), which harbours structural RNA motifs for the replication cycle of the virus. Recent work has shown that this RNA architecture also functions as an IRES (internal ribosome entry site) in HIV-1 and -2, and in SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus). In addition, the IRES extends to the gag coding region for all these viruses and this leads to the synthesis of shorter isoforms of the Gag polyprotein from downstream initiation codons. In the present study, we have investigated how different members of the lentivirus family (namely HIV-1 and -2, and SIV) can initiate protein synthesis by distinct mechanisms. For this, we have used the competitive reticulocyte lysate that we have recently described. Our results show that HIV-1 is able to drive the synthesis of the Gag polyprotein both by a classical cap-dependent mechanism and an IRES, whereas HIV-2 and SIV appear to use exclusively an IRES mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricci et al. (2008) studied Lentivirus infection (HIV-1, HIV-2, SIV). Competitive reticulocyte lysate assay was evaluated on Mechanism of translation initiation for Gag polyprotein. HIV-1 drives Gag polyprotein synthesis via both a classical cap-dependent mechanism and an IRES, whereas HIV-2 and SIV exclusively use an IRES mechanism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: