Key result
Fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin combination therapy significantly reduced sitting systolic blood pressure by an additional 11.62 mmHg and LDL-C by an additional 43.69% compared to dual therapies at 8 weeks.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who did not respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy.
Does fimasartan/amlodipine + rosuvastatin combination therapy improve blood pressure and lipid levels in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy?
RCT (n=138)
Double-blind
1:1:1 ratio
Yes
Does fimasartan/amlodipine + rosuvastatin combination therapy improve blood pressure and lipid levels in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy?
Mean Difference: -11.62 (95% CI -17.04–-6.19)
Absolute Event Rate: -22.72% vs -11.11%
p-value: p=<0.001
A triple combination of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin effectively lowers blood pressure and LDL-C in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia inadequately controlled by fimasartan monotherapy.
Supports triple therapy for hypertension with dyslipidemia uncontrolled on ARB monotherapy; extends RCT evidence for simultaneous BP and lipid control.
BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy involving fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond to fimasartan monotherapy. METHODS: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in adults aged 19-70 years. Patients who voluntarily consented were screened for eligibility to enroll in the study. Patients who failed to respond to 4 weeks of fimasartan monotherapy were randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to the fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (FMS/ALD + RSV) as study group, fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg (FMS/ALD) as control 1 group, and fimasartan 60 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg (FMS + RSV) as control 2 group. The primary efficacy endpoints were the change in the sitting systolic blood pressure and the rate of change in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 8 weeks. The adverse events, adverse drug reactions, physical examination findings, laboratory test results, electrocardiograms, and vital signs were evaluated to assess safety in the study. RESULTS: Of 138 randomized patients, 131 were conducted efficacy analysis, and 125 completed the study. For the change in LDL-C and sitting SBP (SiSBP) as primary efficacy assessments, the change in LDL-C at week 8 was significantly reduce in the FMS/ALD + RSV group than in the control 1 group (P < 0.001). The change in SiSBP at week 8 were greater reduce in the FMS/ALD + RSV group than in the FMS + RSV group (both P < 0.001). For the safety evaluation, there were no differences among the treatment groups in the incidence of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The fimasartan/amlodipine + rosuvastatin combination therapy can effectively and safely lower blood pressure and improve lipid levels in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who fail to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03156842, Registered 17 May 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Essential hypertension and dyslipidemia (n=138). Fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin combination vs. Fimasartan 60 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg was evaluated on Change in sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) from baseline to 8 weeks (MD -11.62 mmHg, 95% CI -17.04 to -6.19, p=<0.001). Fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin combination therapy significantly reduced sitting systolic blood pressure by an additional 11.62 mmHg and LDL-C by an additional 43.69% compared to dual therapies at 8 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: