Key result
The mitral valve is a living structure with intrinsic plasticity that adapts to mechanical stress via TGF-β, challenging the concept that it is merely an innocent bystander in secondary mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
The concept that the mitral valve is an innocent bystander in secondary mitral regurgitation has been challenged, requiring an understanding of stimuli that trigger its plasticity.
This review highlights the active, plastic nature of the mitral valve in secondary mitral regurgitation, challenging the traditional view of it as a passive bystander.
Challenges passive mitral valve model in secondary MR; leaves open TGF-beta targeted therapies for prospective validation.
In secondary mitral regurgitation, the concept that the mitral valve (MV) is an innocent bystander, has been challenged by many studies in the last decades. The MV is a living structure with an intrinsic plasticity that reacts to changes in stretch or in mechanical stress activating bio-humoral mechanisms that have, as purpose, the adaptation of the valve to the new environment. If the adaptation is balanced, the leaflets increase both surface and length and the chordae tendinae lengthen: the result is a valve with different characteristics, but able to avoid or to limit the regurgitation. However, if the adaptation is unbalanced, the leaflets and the chords do not change their size, but become stiffer and rigid, with moderate or severe regurgitation. These changes are mediated mainly by a cytokine, the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), which is able to promote the changes that the MV needs to adapt to a new hemodynamic environment. In general, mild TGF-β activation facilitates leaflet growth, excessive TGF-β activation, as after a myocardial infarction, results in profibrotic changes in the leaflets, with increased thickness and stiffness. The MV is then a plastic organism, that reacts to the external stimuli, trying to maintain its physiologic integrity. This review has the goal to unveil the secret life of the MV, to understand which stimuli can trigger its plasticity and to explain why the equation “large heart=moderate/severe mitral regurgitation” and “small heart=no/mild mitral regurgitation” does not work into the clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calafiore et al. (2020) conducted a review in Secondary mitral regurgitation. The mitral valve is a living structure with intrinsic plasticity that adapts to mechanical stress via TGF-β, challenging the concept that it is merely an innocent bystander in secondary mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: