Key result
Adding preoperative echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score improved prediction of in-hospital mortality or major morbidity with an integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1% (P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does the addition of echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score improve risk prediction for mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgical AVR?
Cohort (n=432)
Yes
Does the addition of echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score improve risk prediction for mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgical AVR?
Effect estimate: integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Echocardiographic measures of LV diastolic dysfunction and RV performance add incremental predictive value to the STS risk score for patients undergoing surgical AVR.
Should not yet change STS-based risk assessment for surgical AVR; leaves open incremental value of echocardiographic parameters.
BACKGROUND: Risk prediction is a critical step in patient selection for aortic valve replacement (AVR), yet existing risk scores incorporate very few echocardiographic parameters. We sought to evaluate the incremental predictive value of a complete echocardiogram to identify high-risk surgical candidates before AVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical AVR with or without coronary bypass was assembled at 2 tertiary centers. Preoperative echocardiograms were reviewed by independent observers to quantify chamber size/function and valve function. Patient databases were queried to extract clinical data. The cohort consisted of 432 patients with a mean age of 73.5 years and 38.7% females. Multivariable logistic regression revealed 3 echocardiographic predictors of in-hospital mortality or major morbidity: E/e' ratio reflective of elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure; myocardial performance index reflective of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction; and small LV end-diastolic cavity size. Addition of these echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score led to an integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1% (P<0.0001). After a median follow-up of 2 years, Cox regression revealed 5 echocardiographic predictors of all-cause mortality: small LV end-diastolic cavity size; LV mass index; mitral regurgitation grade; right atrial area index; and mean aortic gradient <40 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic measures of LV diastolic dysfunction and RV performance add incremental value to the STS risk score and should be integrated in prediction when evaluating the risk of AVR. In addition, findings of small hypertrophied LV cavities and/or low mean aortic gradients confer a higher risk of 2-year mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in severe aortic stenosis (n=432). Preoperative echocardiographic parameters vs. STS risk score alone was evaluated on in-hospital mortality or major morbidity (integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1%, p=<0.0001). Adding preoperative echocardiographic parameters to the STS risk score improved prediction of in-hospital mortality or major morbidity with an integrated discrimination improvement of 4.1% (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: