Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structural, electronic and magnetic properties of two different models of the heterospin polymer chain complexes of Cu2+ hexafluoroacetylacetonate with two pyrazole-substituted nitronyl nitroxides Cu(hfac)2L(R) have been studied by means of multiconfigurational perturbation theory based on a CASSCF (complete active space self-consistent field) wave function, i.e. the CASPT2 method. Our calculations reveal the presence of two minima in the electronic energy curve along the Cu-O(L) bond, separated by only 6 kcal/mol, and corresponding to the X-ray structures of the CuO6 centers in Cu(hfac)2L(Pr) at 115 and 293 K, respectively. The two energetic minima are characterized by a different electronic structure, thus giving rise to a different three-spin exchange coupling and explaining the thermally induced spin transitions in this family of compounds. The concomitant variations in the magnetic properties, i.e. g factors and magnetic moments mu(eff)(T) were calculated and compared with the experimental data of Cu(hfac)2L(Pr). Even if the correspondence is only qualitative, our calculations provide a convincing explanation of the observed magnetic peculiarities. In particular, at low temperatures, the predicted ground-state is 2A(u), well separated from the 2A(g), 4A(u) states and therefore exclusively populated. Its calculated g factors, g(parallel) = 1.848, g(perpendicular) = 1.965, 1.974, qualitatively correspond to the observed g < 2 signals in the low-temperature EPR spectra. The previously assumed formal spin assignment >N-O*-Cu-*O-N < for these linear spin triads is challenged by our calculations, pointing instead to a more important role of the end-standing NO in the exchange interactions with Cu(II).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vancoillie et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: