Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carr has attacked the specificity of the Feulgen reaction on three grounds: that the chromosomes are adsorbents capable of regenerating the color of the Schiff reagent; that selectivity for the nucleus depends on destruction of cytoplasm by acid hydrolysis preceding staining; and that the reaction is not blocked by SO2 water, as he says it should be if staining occurs by a chemical reaction. The first point was tested by staining chromosomes treated with nuclease. They were Feulgen negative, but their protein basis remained intact. The second point was tested by hydrolyzing fixed tissues, washing off solutes, drying, and comparing weight loss with controls. As differences were negligible, the fixed cytoplasm must not have been made soluble by hydrolysis. Carr's third point was not tested experimentally. It is concluded that these objections to specificity of the Feulgen reaction are not valid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward O. Dodson (1946) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: