Key result
Insertion of an implantable venous access system in the inferior epigastric vein was successful in 4 of 5 patients (80%) with no complications.
Why the study?
Is insertion of an implantable venous access system in the inferior epigastric vein feasible and safe in patients with unsuitable jugular or subclavian veins?
Case Report (n=5)
Is insertion of an implantable venous access system in the inferior epigastric vein feasible and safe in patients with unsuitable jugular or subclavian veins?
Insertion of an implantable venous access system via the inferior epigastric vein is a feasible alternative when standard upper body veins are unsuitable.
May support alternative access when upper veins unsuitable; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
A modified technique of inserting an implantable venous access system in the inferior epigastric vein is described. This route can be used in cases where the jugular or subclavian veins are unsuitable. After exposure of the inferior epigastric vein in the lower part of the rectus sheath, the catheter is placed in the vein with its tip at the junction to the iliac vein, with the aid of fluoroscopy and x-ray contrast. Protrusion of the tip into the lumen of the iliac vein is avoided. The technique was successful in four of the five patients where an attempt was made to insert the catheter. In the fifth case the vein was too narrow to allow catheterization. In the four cases where the catheter was successfully inserted there were no complications. This technique may allow use of the inferior vena cava for venous access without the high risk of intravenous thrombosis which is inherent with current methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krog et al. (1989) conducted a case report in Need for central venous access (n=5). Implantable venous access system insertion in the inferior epigastric vein was evaluated on Successful insertion. Insertion of an implantable venous access system in the inferior epigastric vein was successful in 4 of 5 patients (80%) with no complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: