Why the study?
Does the administration of general anesthesia agents increase the risk of complete AV block in patients with intraventricular conduction disturbances?
Does the administration of general anesthesia agents increase the risk of complete AV block in patients with intraventricular conduction disturbances?
Succinylcholine administration during general anesthesia may provoke acute AV block in patients with pre-existing intraventricular conduction disturbances.
Succinylcholine may provoke distal AV block in conduction disease; hypothesis-generating for anesthesia-related complete AV block risk.
In order to assess the risk of complete AV block in patients with intraventricular conduction disturbances who undergo general anesthesia, 20 patients with various conduction defects (7 LBBB, 1 RBBB and 1st degree AV block, 1 incomplete RBBB, 9 RBBB + LAH and 2 RBBB + LPH) were studied by means of His bundle recording and corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) before and after the subministration of thiopental (0.2 g I.V.), succinylcholine (1 mg/kg I.V.), Fluothane (1%) and Ethrane (1.6%). Nineteen patients displayed signs of dizziness or syncope; both the sinus rate and the CSNRT, did not undergo significant variations. A slight and not significant variation of intranodal conduction during sinus rhythm was observed after Fluothane administration (AH was prolonged by 8%). A less evident negative dromotropic action of thiopental and Ethrane was only revealed by atrial pacing. No significant variations were demonstrated in His-ventricular conduction after administration of the various drugs. The maximum average increase (1.5%) of the H-V interval was observed after administration of succinylcholine. Acute AV block distal to the His bundle appeared in three patients after succinylcholine administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santini et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: