Why the study?
Does CVC electrocardiography accurately detect misplaced central venous catheters compared to radiographs in patients undergoing CVC placement?
Does CVC electrocardiography accurately detect misplaced central venous catheters compared to radiographs in patients undergoing CVC placement?
CVC electrocardiography is an accurate and safe alternative to routine radiographic control for confirming central venous catheter placement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CVC electrocardiography as potential radiograph alternative; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
We evaluated 160 electrocardiograms taken after placement of central venous catheters (CVC) to determine their locations. Usable recordings were obtained in 154 patients. Subsequent radiographs revealed 30 misplaced catheters. Twenty-five of those were detected by CVC electrocardiograms. There were five false positive and five false negative traces. The sensitivity of CVC electrocardiography was 96%, the specificity 83.3%, and the total predictive power 93.5%. Electrocardiograms obtained from guide-wires were of significantly better quality than those from 0.9% NaCl filled catheters. The technique is accurate, safe and easy to learn. It may reduce the need for routine radiographic control to less than 10% of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koscielniak-Nielsen et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: