What question did this study set out to answer?

To review the latest scientific evidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, specifically evaluating antiarrhythmic drug interventions in adults and children.

December 3, 2018CirculationOpen Access

2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary

Q: What is the clinical evidence from this study?

Study design: Review. Population: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Intervention: Antiarrhythmic drugs.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

What is the role of antiarrhythmic drugs in adults and children during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Population

Adults and children requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Comparison

Role of antiarrhythmic drugs

Design

Continuous evidence review and consensus statement summary

Authors

JSJasmeet SoarCross-Cutting Cardiology MDMichael W. DonninoBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IMIan MaconochieImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Informs antiarrhythmic choices during CPR; extends prior consensus with GRADE-based adult and pediatric recommendations.

Key Points

To review the latest scientific evidence regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, specifically evaluating antiarrhythmic drug interventions in adults and children.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducted a continuous systematic evaluation of recently published peer-reviewed resuscitation science.
The Advanced Life Support and Pediatric Task Forces evaluated evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
Task force panels integrated evidence assessments, values, and preferences to formulate consensus-based treatment recommendations.
The panel established updated international consensus statements and treatment recommendations concerning antiarrhythmic drug administration during adult and pediatric resuscitation.
Evaluations integrated task force deliberation insights and value judgments based on the GRADE-assessed certainty of the available clinical evidence.
Task force members identified and prioritized key knowledge gaps in emergency cardiovascular pharmacology to direct future scientific investigations.

Structured PICO

What is the role of antiarrhythmic drugs in adults and children during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Population

Adults and children requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Intervention

Antiarrhythmic drugs

The 2018 ILCOR consensus statement provides updated, GRADE-based treatment recommendations for the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in adult and pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cite This Study

Soar et al. (2018) conducted a review in Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Antiarrhythmic drugs was evaluated. The 2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation provides updated treatment recommendations for the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in adults and children during emergency care.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a95dbeb0becc3d96d376f01 https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000611

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider