Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Novel IC-MS/MS method for cationic pesticides comparing the CS17 and CS21 column • Chromatographic separation of diquat and paraquat • IC-MS/MS validation of cationic pesticides in food of plant and animal origin • Study of matrix effects on cationic pesticides using IC-MS/MS Several highly hydrophilic pesticides and metabolites are either permanently cationic or become cationic at low pH. This makes them particularly suited for the analysis by ion chromatography (IC), especially since the suppressor technique enables a safe and reliable connection of IC with tandem mass spectrometry (IC-MS/MS). Here, we present a multi-method for the determination of 16 cationic pesticides using the ‘quick polar pesticides’ (QuPPe) extraction procedure and IC-MS/MS. The method covers permanently cationic compounds like chlormequat, mepiquat, diquat, and paraquat, as well as ionizable compounds like nicotine. Two different cation exchange columns were evaluated. Also, the impact of infusing an organic make-up solvent (e.g. acetonitrile and methanol) to the LC eluate between column exit and ion source entrance was tested at different infusion ratios, with acetonitrile performing best overall in terms of signal enhancements. Moreover, matrix effects tested with different types of matrices proved to be less problematic (±20% in most cases) compared to other chromatographic methods. The final method was successfully validated at low levels in food of plant and animal origin (raspberry, sesame, rice, milk) and the suitability of the method was verified by analysing >100 samples with incurred residues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: