Key result
Mechanical dyssynchrony was observed in 3.8% of the overall Duchenne muscular dystrophy cohort, increasing to 17.1% in those with ejection fraction <55% and 31.2% in advanced disease with fibrosis.
Why the study?
Is mechanical dyssynchrony present in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and can it be assessed by CMR to predict CRT efficacy?
Cohort (n=313)
No
Is mechanical dyssynchrony present in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and can it be assessed by CMR to predict CRT efficacy?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.8% vs 0%
Mechanical dyssynchrony occurs in end-stage Duchenne muscular dystrophy but is associated with normal QRS duration and disperse dyssynchrony, suggesting these patients are unlikely to benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Dyssynchrony mainly in advanced Duchenne disease with normal QRS may not indicate CRT benefit; leaves open CMR's predictive value.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac dysfunction in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a leading cause of death. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to dramatically decrease mortality in eligible adult population with congestive heart failure. We hypothesized that mechanical dyssynchrony is present in DMD patients and that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may predict CRT efficacy. METHODS: DMD patients (n = 236) were stratified into 4 groups based on age, diagnosis of DMD, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), and presence of myocardial fibrosis defined as positive late gadolinum enhancement (LGE) compared to normal controls (n = 77). Dyssynchrony indices were calculated based on timing of CMR derived circumferential strain (ecc). The calculated indices included cross-correlation delay (XCD), uniformity of strain (US), regional vector of variance (RVV), time to maximum strain (TTMS) and standard deviation (SD) of TTMS. Abnormal XCD value was defined as > normal + 2SD. US, RVV, TTMS and SD were calculated for patients with abnormal XCD. RESULTS: There was overall low prevalence of circumferential dyssynchrony in the entire DMD population; it increased to 17.1% for patients with abnormal EF and to 31.2% in the most advanced stage (abnormal EF with fibrosis). All but one DMD patient with mechanical dyssynchrony exhibited normal QRS duration suggesting absence of electrical dyssynchrony. The calculated US and RVV values (0.91 ± 0.09, 1.34 ± 0.48) indicate disperse rather than clustered dyssynchrony. CONCLUSION: Mechanical dyssynchrony is frequent in boys with end stage DMD-associated cardiac dysfunction. It is associated with normal QRS complex as well as extensive lateral fibrosis. Based on these findings, it is unlikely that this patient population will benefit from CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hor et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (n=313). Duchenne muscular dystrophy vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony (abnormal cross-correlation delay). Mechanical dyssynchrony was observed in 3.8% of the overall Duchenne muscular dystrophy cohort, increasing to 17.1% in those with ejection fraction <55% and 31.2% in advanced disease with fibrosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: