Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve left ventricular remodeling and functional class in subgroups of heart failure patients with narrow QRS, NYHA class II, or right ventricular pacing?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve left ventricular remodeling and functional class in subgroups of heart failure patients with narrow QRS, NYHA class II, or right ventricular pacing?
Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to benefit heart failure patients in NYHA class II and those with right ventricular pacing, but not necessarily those with a narrow QRS duration.
May support CRT in NYHA II and RV-paced patients; hypothesis-generating for narrow QRS and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To identify subgroups of heart failure patients who might benefit from biventricular pacing. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the quality of life, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and exercise capacity and decreases hospitalizations for heart failure for patients who have severe heart failure and a wide QRS. It is unclear if other populations of heart failure patients would benefit from CRT. METHODS: One hundred forty-four consecutive heart failure patients who underwent CRT and completed 3 months of follow-up were reviewed. Demographic, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcome data were analyzed to assess the relationship of functional class and QRS duration before device implantation to postimplant outcomes. RESULTS: There were 20, 88, and 36 patients in NYHA functional class II, III, and IV, respectively. Thirty-four patients had right ventricular pacing and another 29 patients had a QRS duration < or = 150 ms. Patients who were in NYHA functional class II at baseline had significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and indices of left ventricular remodeling after CRT. Similar significant findings were seen in the subgroup with right ventricular pacing at baseline after CRT. However, in the subgroup with a narrow QRS duration, there were no significant changes in the indices of left ventricular remodeling or in the NYHA functional class and there was a significant increase in the QRS duration. For the study cohort as a whole, an improvement in NYHA functional class after CRT correlated with a significant decrease in adverse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients who were in NYHA functional class II and those with right ventricular pacing appeared to benefit from CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: