Key result
A novel spectrofluorimetric method using fluorescamine was successfully developed and validated for the determination of midodrine in tablets, achieving an overall recovery of 99.56 ± 0.95%.
A novel, sensitive spectrofluorimetric method using fluorescamine was developed and validated for the quantification of midodrine in pure form and tablets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid midodrine tablet assay in quality labs; leaves open routine adoption pending further validation.
A novel sensitive and simple spectrofluorimetric method was developed then validated for determination of midodrine in both its authentic pure form and its tablets. This method is based on the reaction between midodrine's aliphatic primary amine moiety with fluorescamine reagent, using borate buffer at pH 7.8 and yielding a highly fluorescent product whose fluorescence intensity was measured at 462 nm after excitation at 388 nm. This method represents the first attempt for determination of midodrine spectrofluorimetrically. A calibration curve was constructed showing that the linear range was 0.2–3.0 μg/ml. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation values were 0.06 and 0.19 μg/ml respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) and the determination coefficient (r2) values were 0.9992 and 0.9984 respectively. The proposed method was validated according to ICH guidelines and successfully applied for determination of midodrine in its tablets with an overall % recovery of 99.56 ± 0.95. Finally, the presented method was adapted to study the content uniformity test according to United States Pharmacopeia guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar et al. (2018) studied this question. Spectrofluorimetric determination using fluorescamine was evaluated on Determination of midodrine in tablets (% recovery). A novel spectrofluorimetric method using fluorescamine was successfully developed and validated for the determination of midodrine in tablets, achieving an overall recovery of 99.56 ± 0.95%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: