Key result
A survey of 508 obstetricians and gynecologists revealed widespread variation in the care of women with placenta accreta, with only 23.8% of generalists referring patients to a sub-specialist.
Cross-Sectional (n=508)
There is widespread variation in the care and treatment preferences among obstetricians for women with or at risk for placenta accreta.
Variation in placenta accreta care among obstetricians may affect outcomes; leaves open optimal referral thresholds and standardization needs.
OBJECTIVE: We surveyed obstetricians to determine their knowledge, patterns of care and treatment preferences for women with placenta accreta. METHODS: A 27-item survey was mailed to fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The survey included demographics, questions regarding knowledge and items to examine practice patterns. RESULTS: Among 994 surveyed practitioners 508 responded including 338 who practiced obstetrics. Among generalists, 23.8% of respondents referred patients with placenta accreta to a sub-specialist. Overall, 20.4% referred women to the nearest tertiary center, and 7.1% referred to a regional center. Delivery was recommended at 34-36 weeks by 41.2%. Adjuvant interventions including ureteral stents (26.3%), iliac artery embolization catheters (28.1%), and balloon occlusion catheters (20.1%) were used infrequently. Six or more units of blood were crossed for delivery by only 29.0% of practitioners. CONCLUSION: There is widespread variation in the care of women with or at risk for placenta accreta.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Placenta accreta (n=508). Survey on practice patterns and knowledge regarding placenta accreta was evaluated on Practice patterns including referral, delivery timing, adjuvant interventions, and blood preparation. A survey of 508 obstetricians and gynecologists revealed widespread variation in the care of women with placenta accreta, with only 23.8% of generalists referring patients to a sub-specialist.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: