Key result
Virtual reality measurement of the maximal LAA ostium diameter had a stronger correlation with implanted device size (ρc=0.78) than CCTA (ρc=0.52) or TEE (ρc=0.60).
Why the study?
To explore the feasibility and accuracy of virtual reality derived from CCTA data to predict left atrial appendage occlusion device size.
Does virtual reality derived from CCTA improve the accuracy of left atrial appendage occluder device size prediction compared to standard CCTA and TEE?
Observational (n=20)
Does virtual reality derived from CCTA improve the accuracy of left atrial appendage occluder device size prediction compared to standard CCTA and TEE?
Virtual reality derived from CCTA provides highly accurate pre-procedural measurements of the left atrial appendage ostium, correlating better with implanted device size than standard CCTA or TEE.
VR from CCTA may aid LAAO sizing; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Aim To explore the feasibility and accuracy of virtual reality (VR) derived from cardiac computed angiography (CCTA) data to predict left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device size. Method Retrospective data of patients who underwent LAAO according to clinical indication were reviewed; all patients underwent a pre-procedural CCTA. Measurements of the left atrial appendage (LAA) orifice diameters by CCTA, VR, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (acquired during the procedure) were compared to the implanted device size. The LAA perimeter was calculated using the Ramanujan approximation. Statistical analyses included Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient ( ρ c ), the mean difference, and the mean square error (MSE). Results The sample was composed of 20 patients (mean age 75.7 ± 7.5 years, 60% males) who underwent successful LAAO insertion (ACP™ N = 8, Watchman™ N = 12). The CCTA, VR, and TEE maximal diameter ρ c was 0.52, 0.78 and 0.60, respectively with mean differences of +0.92 ± 4.0 mm, −1.12 ± 2.3 mm, and −3.45 ± 2.69 mm, respectively. The CCTA, VR, and TEE perimeter calculations ρ c were 0.49, 0.54, and 0.39 respectively with mean differences of +4.69 ± 11.5 mm, −9.88 ± 8.0 mm, and −16.79 ± 7.8 respectively. Discussion A VR visualization of the LAA ostium in different perspectives allows for a better understanding of its funnel-shaped structure. VR measurement of the maximal ostium diameter had the strongest correlation with the diameter of the inserted device. VR may thus provide new imaging possibilities for the evaluation of complex pre-procedural structures such as the LAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tejman‐Yarden et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) (n=20). Virtual reality (VR) derived from CCTA vs. CCTA and TEE was evaluated on Concordance of maximal LAA orifice diameter with implanted device size. Virtual reality measurement of the maximal LAA ostium diameter had a stronger correlation with implanted device size (ρc=0.78) than CCTA (ρc=0.52) or TEE (ρc=0.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: