Key result
AMPLATZER AMULET devices were closer to the mitral valve annulus than WATCHMAN devices (6.6 mm vs 10.9 mm, P=0.001) on cardiac computed tomography angiography 6 months post-implantation.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the potential impairment of neighboring structures by implanted left atrial appendage closure devices.
Does standardized cCTA imaging accurately measure distances from implanted LAAC devices to neighboring structures?
Observational (n=48)
Does standardized cCTA imaging accurately measure distances from implanted LAAC devices to neighboring structures?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.6% vs 10.9%
p-value: p=0.001
Standardized cCTA imaging accurately measures distances from LAAC devices to neighboring structures, revealing that the left upper pulmonary vein and circumflex artery are closest and potentially most prone to impairment.
cCTA measurements flag proximity risks after LAAC; leaves open whether device choice affects clinical complications.
BACKGROUND: Although left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy and topographic relations are well understood, little is known about the impairment of neighboring structures (NBS) by an implanted left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device. This prospective longitudinal observational study for the first time describes distances of implanted LAA closure (LAAC) devices to NBS using a standardized imaging protocol of cardiac computed tomography angiography (cCTA). HYPOTHESIS: cCTA imaging is an eligible tool for post-implantation evaluation of LAAC devices and their relation to neighboring structures. METHODS: cCTA data sets of consecutive patients 6 months after successful LAAC were acquired on a third generation dual-source CT system and reconstructed with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm. The standardized multi-planar reconstruction LAA occluder view for post-implantation evaluation (LOVE) algorithm was used to measure the distances to NBS in relation to LAA morphology and implanted LAAC devices. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients (median age 80 years, 25% female) were included. Left upper pulmonary vein and circumflex artery were generally closest to occlusion devices (median 2.9 and 2.8 mm, respectively). AMPLATZER AMULET devices were closer to the mitral valve annulus than WATCHMAN devices (6.6 mm (inter quartile range [IQR] 4.9-8.6) vs 10.9 mm (IQR 7.4-14.0), P = 0.001). Distances to the left upper pulmonary vein were affected by LAA morphology, with cauliflower type having the closest proximity (1.7 mm [IQR 1.0-3.4], P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: A standardized cCTA imaging protocol is an eligible tool to accurately measure distances to NBS. Left upper pulmonary vein and circumflex artery are closest to LAAC devices and could thus be most prone to impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindner et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Successful left atrial appendage closure (n=48). AMPLATZER AMULET device vs. WATCHMAN device was evaluated on Distance to the mitral valve annulus (p=0.001). AMPLATZER AMULET devices were closer to the mitral valve annulus than WATCHMAN devices (6.6 mm vs 10.9 mm, P=0.001) on cardiac computed tomography angiography 6 months post-implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: