Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was designed to test the interaction between amyloid-β and tau proteins as a determinant of metabolic decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We assessed 120 cognitively normal individuals with [ 18 F]florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements at baseline, as well as [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET at baseline and at 24 months. A voxel-based interaction model was built to test the associations between continuous measurements of CSF biomarkers, [ 18 F]florbetapir and [ 18 F]FDG standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR). We found that the synergistic interaction between [ 18 F]florbetapir SUVR and CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau) measurements, rather than the sum of their independent effects, was associated with a 24-month metabolic decline in basal and mesial temporal, orbitofrontal, and anterior and posterior cingulate cortices ( P <0.001). In contrast, interactions using CSF amyloid-β 1–42 and total tau biomarkers did not associate with metabolic decline over a time frame of 24 months. The interaction found in this study further support the framework that amyloid-β and hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates synergistically interact to cause downstream AD neurodegeneration. In fact, the regions displaying the metabolic decline reported here were confined to brain networks affected early by amyloid-β plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Preventive clinical trials may benefit from using a combination of amyloid-β PET and p-tau biomarkers to enrich study populations of cognitively normal subjects with a high probability of disease progression in studies, using [ 18 F]FDG as a biomarker of efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascoal et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: