Key result
A tailored 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program for women yielded similar improvements in 1-minute heart rate recovery compared to a traditional program (P=0.777).
Why the study?
Does a tailored cardiac rehabilitation program improve heart rate recovery more than a traditional program in women?
RCT (n=236)
Does a tailored cardiac rehabilitation program improve heart rate recovery more than a traditional program in women?
Absolute Event Rate: 19.1% vs 16.9%
p-value: p=0.777
Both tailored and traditional 12-week cardiac rehabilitation programs significantly improve heart rate recovery in women, with no significant difference between the two approaches.
Tailored cardiac rehabilitation need not supplant traditional programs in women; confirms equivalent efficacy for heart rate recovery.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise cessation is thought to reflect the rate of reestablishment of parasympathetic tone. Relatively little research has focused on improved HRR in women after completing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) exercise training. OBJECTIVE: We examined the influence of exercise training on HRR in women completing a traditional CR program and in women completing a CR program tailored for women. METHODS: A 2-group randomized clinical trial compared HRR between 99 women completing a traditional 12-week CR program and 137 women completing a tailored CR program. Immediately upon completion of a symptom-limited graded exercise test, HRR was measured at 1 through 6 minutes. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, improvement in 1-minute HRR (HRR1) was similar (P = 0.777) between the tailored (mean [SD], 17.5 [11] to 19.1 [12]) and the traditional CR program (15.7 [9.0] to 16.9 [9.5]). The amount of change in the 2-minute HRR (HRR2) for the tailored (30 [13] to 32.8 [14.6]) and traditional programs (28.3 [12.8] to 31.2 [13.7]) also was not different (P = 0.391). Similar results were observed for HRR at 3 through 6 minutes. Given these comparable improvements of the 2 programs, in the full cohort, the factors independently predictive of post-CR HRR1, in rank order, were baseline HRR1 (part correlation, 0.35; P < 0.001); peak exercise capacity, estimated as metabolic equivalents (METs; 0.24, P < 0.001); anxiety (-0.17, P = 0.001); and age (-0.13, P = 0.016). The factors independently associated with post-CR HRR2 were baseline HRR2 (0.44, P < 0.001), peak METs (0.21, P < 0.001), and insulin use (-0.10, P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: One to 6 minutes after exercise cessation, HRR was significantly improved among the women completing both CR programs. The modifiable factors positively associated with HRR1 included peak METs and lower anxiety, whereas HRR2 was associated with insulin administration and peak METs. Additional research on HRR after exercise training in women is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckie et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=236). Tailored cardiac rehabilitation program vs. Traditional 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program was evaluated on Improvement in 1-minute heart rate recovery (HRR1) (p=0.777). A tailored 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program for women yielded similar improvements in 1-minute heart rate recovery compared to a traditional program (P=0.777).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: